(1) If it appears to the Committee after considering the complaint made and taking into account the information submitted under subrule 20(4), if any, that the complaint against a Peguam Syarie is without merit, it shall dismiss the complaint.
(2) If it appears to the Committee after considering the complaint made and by taking into account the information submitted under subrule 20(4), if any, that there exists a prima facie case against the Peguam Syarie the Committee shall-
(a) direct that a charge containing the facts of the conduct complained of and the grounds on which it is proposed to remove him from the Register or to suspend him from practice or to censure him, be sent to the Peguam Syarie; and
(b) call upon the Peguam Syarie to make, within a period of twenty-one days from the date he receives the charges, a written representation containing the grounds upon which he relies to exculpate himself.
(3) If, after considering the written representation made pursuant to paragraph 2(b) together with all other informations, if any, the Committee finds that the Peguam Syarie is not gulity, the Committee shall acquit him.
(4) If the Peguam Syarie does not make any written representation within the period specified in paragraph (2)(b) or if the Peguam Syarie made such written representation but the written representation does not exculpate himself to the satisfaction of the Committee and the Committee finds that the Peguam Syarie is gulity, the Committee shall decide on the removal from the Register, suspension from practice or censure of the Peguam Syarie.
(5) If the Committee is of the opinion that the case against the Peguam Syarie requires further clarification, the Committee may establish an Investigation Committee for the purpose of obtaining such further clarification.